I have enlisted some help to make my cards look nice and solve some of the remaining graphic design problems. What do you think? A little better, eh?
After buying Gloomhaven and getting it out of and back into its box, I decided it needed to have some player caddies.
There’s a marker for health and experience points, and a little slot for “lost” cards to be put inside. When the game is over all these components can be placed inside. It’s my first attempt at making a paper-and-wood product.
The design for the backs of the Deckahedron cards is done, and I just wanted to share it.
The design is by Ben Didier and there’s a couple great things about it:
- newly designed “suits”: anvil, blades, crown, dragon
- look at those little dots!
- it helps me start imagining what the Deckahedron might look like if a lot more was spent on production value of the physical card deck
After analyzing Genesys and FATE, I’m now ready to tease apart all the different steps in the core resolution mechanism of A Thousand Faces of Adventure. And here it is.
I think I’ve done a good job keeping it tight, and bottlenecking in the lines rather than having an exploding spiderweb. But I’m biased of course.
For the source SVG file, have a look here:
I finally chose a title.
A Thousand Faces of Adventure
It was a hard slog and there were a lot of darlings I had to throw out, but I’m really excited about this name.
For one, it’s a play on “The Hero With A Thousand Faces”, which is Joseph Campbell’s flagship contribution to the study of myth and story structure.
It also does a good job of conveying certain aspects of this game. It’s a generic game, where the setting is discovered and created during play. By including “Adventure”, it sets the right expectation about genre. Finally it hints at the card-based components with “Faces”.
Equally important, the domain name 1kfa.com was available, and the only competing search result was the above-mentioned book.
More exercise! I’ve been drawing up some flowcharts for the “core resolution mechanism” of a few different RPGs. Here’s the flowchart for Genesys.
As an exercise, I’ve been drawing up some flowcharts for the “core resolution mechanism” of a few different RPGs. Here’s the flowchart for FATE Accelerated.Here’s the source SVG file:
The most important feedback I got at KublaCon this year was that my title needs to be better. “Deckahedron World” appealed to me because I like puns, and I felt it was a nice nod to it’s parent, Dungeon World.
But the title of the game isn’t for me, it’s for the audience, and “Deckahedron World” doesn’t serve the audience. It doesn’t help the audience know what the game is about. If someone walked into a game shop and saw a box on the shelf saying “Deckahedron World”, would they have any impression about whether this was something they would enjoy? Would they want to pick up the box and have a look?
Thanks to James Ernest for helping me see this.
Which of these names do you think would give you a good impression? If you saw a box on a shelf entitled thusly, would you pick it up and look at the cover? What kind of expectation would you have of it?
- Ye Brave Heroes
- Hearthember Journeys
- Master the Myth
- Campfire of Heroes
- The Ascendant Circle
- Face Myth, Become Legend
- Crucible of Legends
- Epic of the Hearthlighters
- Legends to Fear or Be
- Bearers of the Hearthflame
- Campfire Epics
- Deckahedron Legends
- Flipped Fantasy
Last weekend was spent at KublaCon, which was an opportunity to hang out with friends, play some new board games, and excitedly run some playtests of Deckahedron World.
I was very pleased with the playtests. One one hand I received several comments from testers that they thought the game was a lot of fun, but more importantly for the stage I’m at now, several bugs in the system were exposed. Beyond those, I also noticed some friction that different players were experiencing with the system.
I’ve now got pages of notes that are slowly being digested and used to refine the system and the documentation. I’ll be back next year with a great game!
Boardcrafting was in the New York Times (sort of)!
I was doing some vanity googling tonight, as one does – sometimes it’s fun to see where images of the Boardcrafting Catan boards pop up, and I saw a still image clearly captured from a video. On further investigation, it was a video from a NYT tech blog featuring Dan Shapiro talking about Glowforge. Very cool!
In their early prototype stage, I shared the Catan tile designs with the Glowforge folks, and I’ve seen it in their marketing materials here and there. They’ve since created their own in-house Catan design, but this NYT video was shot when they were still using mine.
If you’re interested in laser cutting, check out Glowforge, I’ve got one myself and am very happy with it. Plus, they made me famous.